<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Science in major Science Publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/585/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/585</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Politics, Technology and the world around us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Climate Change Risk &#171; Musings of the Technical Bard</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/585/comment-page-1#comment-2839</link>
		<dc:creator>On Climate Change Risk &#171; Musings of the Technical Bard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=585#comment-2839</guid>
		<description>[...] of my readers has asked a question about climate risk.  Recently, statements have been made in various publications, ranging from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of my readers has asked a question about climate risk.  Recently, statements have been made in various publications, ranging from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BikingBrian</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/585/comment-page-1#comment-2838</link>
		<dc:creator>BikingBrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=585#comment-2838</guid>
		<description>Did you see this article in the Economist? Would be interested in hearing your thoughts.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15720419

I know you&#039;ve spent a lot more time doing your homework on this subject than me, but I agree in concept with the tagline: &quot;action on climate is justified, not because the science is certain, but precisely because it is not.&quot; But how much action and how far-reaching should it be?  The risks/costs need to be quantified, and now we are back into the uncertainty discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see this article in the Economist? Would be interested in hearing your thoughts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15720419" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15720419</a></p>
<p>I know you&#8217;ve spent a lot more time doing your homework on this subject than me, but I agree in concept with the tagline: &#8220;action on climate is justified, not because the science is certain, but precisely because it is not.&#8221; But how much action and how far-reaching should it be?  The risks/costs need to be quantified, and now we are back into the uncertainty discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johndoe124</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/585/comment-page-1#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>johndoe124</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=585#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m barely 100 pages into &quot;Red, Hot Lies&quot; and it&#039;s one of the filthiest, most disgusting books I&#039;ve ever read.  I wouldn&#039;t trust any of these green *#$*#*$*#*#* as far as I can spit.  The whole green movement is a roiling, fetid pustule of corruption that engulfs science, academia, the press, and corporations.  The depth and extent of corruption is simply mind-boggling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m barely 100 pages into &#8220;Red, Hot Lies&#8221; and it&#8217;s one of the filthiest, most disgusting books I&#8217;ve ever read.  I wouldn&#8217;t trust any of these green *#$*#*$*#*#* as far as I can spit.  The whole green movement is a roiling, fetid pustule of corruption that engulfs science, academia, the press, and corporations.  The depth and extent of corruption is simply mind-boggling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

