<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AGW feedback loop &#8220;weaker than thought&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/545/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/545</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Politics, Technology and the world around us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/545/comment-page-1#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=545#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>Garbage In Garbage Out - further magnified by Garbage modeling..

You just cannot cherry pick which major climatic and environmental systems you want to model - this is ignoring the process that generated all the oil carbon we are burning now. very weird.

BTW for blow by blow coverage of climategate and my conclusions on this follow my weblink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garbage In Garbage Out &#8211; further magnified by Garbage modeling..</p>
<p>You just cannot cherry pick which major climatic and environmental systems you want to model &#8211; this is ignoring the process that generated all the oil carbon we are burning now. very weird.</p>
<p>BTW for blow by blow coverage of climategate and my conclusions on this follow my weblink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical Bard</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/545/comment-page-1#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical Bard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=545#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>So try this one. 

CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our time

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/20_1-2_CO2_Scandal.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So try this one. </p>
<p>CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our time</p>
<p><a href="http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/20_1-2_CO2_Scandal.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/20_1-2_CO2_Scandal.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/545/comment-page-1#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=545#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>What I find more troubling about the IPCC&#039;s model not including the carbon cycle is that we didn&#039;t know the IPCC&#039;s model didn&#039;t include a carbon cycle.  Why not?  In their methodology so opaque that we only know its failings when they tell us about them?

Imagine if we graded kids in school like that.  &quot;Hey, Johnny, you get an A unless you make a point of telling me that you didn&#039;t learn anything, okay?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find more troubling about the IPCC&#8217;s model not including the carbon cycle is that we didn&#8217;t know the IPCC&#8217;s model didn&#8217;t include a carbon cycle.  Why not?  In their methodology so opaque that we only know its failings when they tell us about them?</p>
<p>Imagine if we graded kids in school like that.  &#8220;Hey, Johnny, you get an A unless you make a point of telling me that you didn&#8217;t learn anything, okay?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

