<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Science on TV (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/353/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/353</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Politics, Technology and the world around us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:16:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leeky Sweek</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/353/comment-page-1#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeky Sweek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=353#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>As a musician, it annoys me when they can&#039;t get actors to at least reasonably simulate playing a musical instrument.  One of the worst for this is the Bond movie &quot;Moonraker.&quot;  The actor isn&#039;t even pushing down on the keys of his piano while playing.  Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a musician, it annoys me when they can&#8217;t get actors to at least reasonably simulate playing a musical instrument.  One of the worst for this is the Bond movie &#8220;Moonraker.&#8221;  The actor isn&#8217;t even pushing down on the keys of his piano while playing.  Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/353/comment-page-1#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=353#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why they don&#039;t make shows for smart people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why they don&#8217;t make shows for smart people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilD</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/353/comment-page-1#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=353#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Script writers don&#039;t care about facts. 
I&#039;m always irritated when a particular myth is perpetrated regarding gasoline and the use of it as a weapon.
I cringe whenever I see a character pour gasoline over a large area, either indoor or out, and then strike a match and threaten to blow the place up by throwing said match into the pool of this flammable liquid.
This implies that the liquid is what will burn when in fact it is the vapour that burns and, unfortunately for the person striking the match, the vapour is released when it&#039;s spread across the floor and that person is standing right in the middle of this explosive cloud.
Striking the match will usually result in an immediate explosion that would likely kill or seriously injure everyone in the area.
No time to issue threats or give the good guys time to get away. Just a big bang and bodies all over the place.

People also don&#039;t realize that when a scene inside of a burning building is being played out the special effects people have to remove all of the smoke to allow the actors to be seen. Otherwise the screen would be black and that&#039;s hardly exciting to watch.  
Problem is that it&#039;s usually the smoke that kills people in fires so for the sake of the story line the danger of smoke is replaced by the danger of flames but the truth is that if a body burns in a fire that person is usually dead already from smoke inhalation.
NeilD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Script writers don&#8217;t care about facts.<br />
I&#8217;m always irritated when a particular myth is perpetrated regarding gasoline and the use of it as a weapon.<br />
I cringe whenever I see a character pour gasoline over a large area, either indoor or out, and then strike a match and threaten to blow the place up by throwing said match into the pool of this flammable liquid.<br />
This implies that the liquid is what will burn when in fact it is the vapour that burns and, unfortunately for the person striking the match, the vapour is released when it&#8217;s spread across the floor and that person is standing right in the middle of this explosive cloud.<br />
Striking the match will usually result in an immediate explosion that would likely kill or seriously injure everyone in the area.<br />
No time to issue threats or give the good guys time to get away. Just a big bang and bodies all over the place.</p>
<p>People also don&#8217;t realize that when a scene inside of a burning building is being played out the special effects people have to remove all of the smoke to allow the actors to be seen. Otherwise the screen would be black and that&#8217;s hardly exciting to watch.<br />
Problem is that it&#8217;s usually the smoke that kills people in fires so for the sake of the story line the danger of smoke is replaced by the danger of flames but the truth is that if a body burns in a fire that person is usually dead already from smoke inhalation.<br />
NeilD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brrr</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/353/comment-page-1#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Brrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=353#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>Pssst...

It&#039;s a MOVIE. You&#039;re supposed to suspend your disbelief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pssst&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a MOVIE. You&#8217;re supposed to suspend your disbelief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
