Comments on: Oil Sands CO2 emissions only slightly higher than other oil sources http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/329 Thoughts on Politics, Technology and the world around us Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:12:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Wayne http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/329/comment-page-1#comment-1158 Wayne Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:25:04 +0000 http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=329#comment-1158 It won't make any difference. When they can inflate the effect of a difference between .035% CO2 and .04% CO2 into the perceived crisis as they have, a 'marginal' difference such as shown in the graph above obviously proves the end of the world is nigh. It won’t make any difference. When they can inflate the effect of a difference between .035% CO2 and .04% CO2 into the perceived crisis as they have, a ‘marginal’ difference such as shown in the graph above obviously proves the end of the world is nigh.

]]> By: MrEd http://www.technicalbard.com/archives/329/comment-page-1#comment-1157 MrEd Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:07:23 +0000 http://www.technicalbard.com/?p=329#comment-1157 Their big bitch was "GHG" emmisions... well duh... H2O is part of the criteria defining GHG's... so yes, using steam and presure to get the oil out of sand is likely going to let some H2O into the atmosphere...but then so does Niagra Falls...are they going to close it down or reshunt the water to cut back on all that added water vapor??? (Too Funny...my confirmation words are "one toxins") Their big bitch was “GHG” emmisions… well duh… H2O is part of the criteria defining GHG’s… so yes, using steam and presure to get the oil out of sand is likely going to let some H2O into the atmosphere…but then so does Niagra Falls…are they going to close it down or reshunt the water to cut back on all that added water vapor???

(Too Funny…my confirmation words are “one toxins”)

]]>